Response to “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism” By Rachels Essay

In the text The Challenge of Cultural Relativism, pack Rachels breaks down and discusses the system of Cultural Relativism by presenting the pros and cons of this theory. He exposes more or slight of the shortcomings of the theory arguing that some of the claims are wrong and contradictory. The theory of Cultural Relativism states that on that point is no such thing as universal truth in ethics there are only the various cultural codes. In other words, the view of moral or ethical systems vary from husbandry to culture, therefore, we cannot say if single system is better than any other. In his text, Rachels argues that the radical of cultural relativism is an invalid argument, that it leads to implausible consequences, and that moral codes are not only when different. At the same time, Rachels concludes that there are no good or bad things, but social norms likewise, the cultural relativism influences us to have an blustering mind. Rachels begins by explaining that the cu ltural differences argument is invalid because the conclusion does not unavoidably follow from the premises.Here Rachels uses as argument the old belief that the earthly concern was flat, which is wrong, to show that if you believe in something, it does not necessary has to be true. Furthermore, Rachels argues that some of the possible consequences of this theory are that we cannot criticize sadistic cultures. In this case, he uses the anti-Semitic example to claim that if cultural relativism establishes that it is wrong to criticize this build of action because they are part of the cultural code, then the theory is incorrect. At the same time, another of the serious consequences is that we cannot criticize our own culture, much less try to reform it since the theory states that it is wrong to make intracultural judgments. In other words, Rachels says that if cultural relativism is true, then what MLK Jr. did was wrong because his actions were against the moral code of his cultur e. Finally, Rachels discusses how the beliefs of one culture to another do not differ at all, since there are things that are essential in any society.